The leaders of multiple ecological and environmental bureaus in Hunan Province have been intensively replaced, and Hebei Province has announced the second batch of fraudulent cases, releasing signals of stricter monitoring data supervision. The "strictest environmental protection storm" has entered a critical moment! However, under high pressure, illegal activities are repeatedly prohibited, and enterprises should pay attention to the red line of fraudulent behavior! So how can we strengthen supervision during and after the incident to avoid the problem of data fraud?
The "strictest environmental storm" has entered a critical moment! Recently, the top leaders of ecological and environmental bureaus in multiple regions of Hunan Province have undergone intensive changes in leadership. The newly appointed directors are respectively responsible for monitoring, data, and inspection work, revealing signals of strict investigation into third-party and enterprise fraud. Hebei Province organized a special campaign to crack down on the issue of third-party environmental protection service agencies engaging in fraud, fully playing a warning role and exposing 9 typical cases of suspected fraud.
In two days and three places, the environmental bureau's "top leaders" have intensively changed their positions, and the "strictest environmental protection storm" has entered a critical moment.
On April 25th, Xie Kun was appointed as the Director of the Ecological Environment Bureau of Chenzhou City, previously serving as the Director of the Ecological Environment Monitoring Department of the Hunan Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment.
On April 26th, Zhang Wu was appointed as the Director of the Ecological Environment Bureau of Changsha City. Zhang Wu was previously the Director and Party Secretary of the Changsha Data Resources Management Bureau, and Yi Yong was appointed as the Director of the Ecological Environment Bureau of Huaihua City. Yi Yong previously served as a member of the Standing Committee of the Huaihua City Commission for Discipline Inspection, Secretary General, and a member of the Municipal Supervision Committee.
From this personnel appointment, it can be seen that as a relatively professional field, only one city has employed professionals from its own system in the promotion of the three city ecological environment bureaus, while the other two cities boldly appointed government department leaders and backbone elites.
The predecessors of the three newly appointed directors were monitoring, data, and supervision. Although not all of them are directly involved in the field of environmental protection, they have more professional career experience, richer work experience, and more comprehensive comprehensive qualities.
This also sends a strong signal to the public: ecological environment protection work has entered a critical moment, and monitoring, law enforcement, supervision, supervision, and other means are fully gathered. This time, the "strictest environmental storm" is not just talk.